Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques

dc.contributor.author Aghaeepour, Nima
dc.contributor.author Finak, Greg
dc.contributor.author Hoos, Holger
dc.contributor.author Mosmann, Tim R.
dc.contributor.author Brinkman, Ryan
dc.contributor.author Gottardo, Raphael
dc.contributor.author Scheuermann, Richard H.
dc.contributor.author Dougall, David
dc.contributor.author Khodabakhshi, Alireza Hadj
dc.contributor.author Mah, Phillip
dc.contributor.author Obermoser, Gerlinde
dc.contributor.author Spidlen, Josef
dc.contributor.author Taylor, Ian
dc.contributor.author Wuensch, Sherry A.
dc.contributor.author Bramson, Jonathan
dc.contributor.author Eaves, Connie
dc.contributor.author Weng, Andrew P.
dc.contributor.author Fortuno, Edgardo S.
dc.contributor.author Ho, Kevin
dc.contributor.author Kollmann, Tobias R.
dc.contributor.author Rogers, Wade
dc.contributor.author De Rosa, Stephen
dc.contributor.author Dalai, Bakul
dc.contributor.author Azad, Ariful
dc.contributor.author Pothen, Alex
dc.contributor.author Brandes, Aaron
dc.contributor.author Bretschneider, Hannes
dc.contributor.author Bruggner, Robert
dc.contributor.author Finck, Rachel
dc.contributor.author Jia, Robin
dc.contributor.author Zimmerman, Noah
dc.contributor.author Linderman, Michael
dc.contributor.author Dill, David
dc.contributor.author Nolan, Gary
dc.contributor.author Chan, Cliburn
dc.contributor.author Khettabi, Faysal El
dc.contributor.author O'Neill, Kieran
dc.contributor.author Chikina, Maria
dc.contributor.author Ge, Yongchao
dc.contributor.author Sealfon, Stuart
dc.contributor.author Sugár, István
dc.contributor.author Gupta, Arvind
dc.contributor.author Shooshtari, Parisa
dc.contributor.author Zare, Habil
dc.contributor.author De Jager, Philip L.
dc.contributor.author Jiang, Mike
dc.contributor.author Keilwagen, Jens
dc.contributor.author Maisog, Jose M.
dc.contributor.author Luta, George
dc.contributor.author Barbo, Andrea A.
dc.contributor.author Májek, Peter
dc.contributor.author Vilček, Jozef
dc.contributor.author Manninen, Tapio
dc.contributor.author Huttunen, Heikki
dc.contributor.author Ruusuvuori, Pekka
dc.contributor.author Nykter, Matti
dc.contributor.author McLachlan, Geoffrey J.
dc.contributor.author Wang, Kui
dc.contributor.author Naim, Iftekhar
dc.contributor.author Sharma, Gaurav
dc.contributor.author Nikolic, Radina
dc.contributor.author Pyne, Saumyadipta
dc.contributor.author Qian, Yu
dc.contributor.author Qiu, Peng
dc.contributor.author Quinn, John
dc.contributor.author Roth, Andrew
dc.contributor.author Meyer, Pablo
dc.contributor.author Stolovitzky, Gustavo
dc.contributor.author Saez-Rodriguez, Julio
dc.contributor.author Norel, Raquel
dc.contributor.author Bhattacharjee, Madhuchhanda
dc.contributor.author Biehl, Michael
dc.contributor.author Bucher, Philipp
dc.contributor.author Bunte, Kerstin
dc.contributor.author Di Camillo, Barbara
dc.contributor.author Sambo, Francesco
dc.contributor.author Sanavia, Tiziana
dc.contributor.author Trifoglio, Emanuele
dc.contributor.author Toffolo, Gianna
dc.contributor.author Slavica Dimitrieva, S. D.
dc.contributor.author Dreos, Rene
dc.contributor.author Ambrosini, Giovanna
dc.contributor.author Grau, Jan
dc.contributor.author Grosse, Ivo
dc.contributor.author Posch, Stefan
dc.contributor.author Guex, Nicolas
dc.contributor.author Kursa, Miron
dc.contributor.author Rudnicki, Witold
dc.contributor.author Liu, Bo
dc.contributor.author Maienschein-Cline, Mark
dc.contributor.author Schneider, Petra
dc.contributor.author Seifert, Michael
dc.contributor.author Strickert, Marc
dc.contributor.author Vilar, Jose M.G.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-27T04:08:26Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-27T04:08:26Z
dc.date.issued 2013-03-01
dc.description.abstract Traditional methods for flow cytometry (FCM) data processing rely on subjective manual gating. Recently, several groups have developed computational methods for identifying cell populations in multidimensional FCM data. The Flow Cytometry: Critical Assessment of Population Identification Methods (FlowCAP) challenges were established to compare the performance of these methods on two tasks: (i) mammalian cell population identification, to determine whether automated algorithms can reproduce expert manual gating and (ii) sample classification, to determine whether analysis pipelines can identify characteristics that correlate with external variables (such as clinical outcome). This analysis presents the results of the first FlowCAP challenges. Several methods performed well as compared to manual gating or external variables using statistical performance measures, which suggests that automated methods have reached a sufficient level of maturity and accuracy for reliable use in FCM data analysis. © 2013 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.citation Nature Methods. v.10(3)
dc.identifier.issn 15487091
dc.identifier.uri 10.1038/NMETH.2365
dc.identifier.uri http://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth.2365
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.uohyd.ac.in/handle/1/6449
dc.title Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques
dc.type Journal. Article
dspace.entity.type
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: