Divine labours, devalued work: the continuing saga of India’s surrogacy regulation

dc.contributor.author Banerjee, Sneha
dc.contributor.author Kotiswaran, Prabha
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-27T02:00:07Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-27T02:00:07Z
dc.date.issued 2021-01-01
dc.description.abstract This article offers a feminist critique of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2019. Fifteen years since the first proposed regulation of assisted reproductive technologies and surrogacy, the 2019 Bill leaves much to be desired. It reflects a limited understanding of the complexities of surrogacy, is discriminatory in its approach, is plagued by lack of clarity, is unrealistic and most importantly, does not include adequate safeguards for the surrogate. Women’s reproductive labour in performing surrogacy is valorized but not compensated. Even though the Bill may well accept some recommendations of the Rajya Sabha select Committee, its failure to address issues that we highlight will mean that if passed, it will be challenged in the courts on constitutional grounds. This will generate uncertainty for years, for many infertile couples and individuals who look to the law for streamlined regulation, defeating its main purpose in facilitating a novel mode of reproduction.
dc.identifier.citation Indian Law Review. v.5(1)
dc.identifier.issn 24730580
dc.identifier.uri 10.1080/24730580.2020.1843317
dc.identifier.uri https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/24730580.2020.1843317
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.uohyd.ac.in/handle/1/4389
dc.subject commercial surrogacy
dc.subject reproductive labour
dc.subject reproductive rights
dc.subject reproductive technologies
dc.subject Surrogacy
dc.title Divine labours, devalued work: the continuing saga of India’s surrogacy regulation
dc.type Journal. Article
dspace.entity.type
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: