Ocular Trauma in a Rural Population of Southern India. The Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study

dc.contributor.author Krishnaiah, Sannapaneni
dc.contributor.author Nirmalan, Praveen K.
dc.contributor.author Shamanna, Bindiganavale R.
dc.contributor.author Srinivas, Marmamula
dc.contributor.author Rao, Gullapalli N.
dc.contributor.author Thomas, Ravi
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-27T04:11:15Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-27T04:11:15Z
dc.date.issued 2006-07-01
dc.description.abstract Objective: To determine the prevalence of ocular trauma and proportion of blindness and visual impairment due to ocular trauma in a rural population of southern India. Design: Population-based cross-sectional epidemiological study. Participants: A total of 7771 subjects of all ages, representative of the rural population of Andhra Pradesh. Methods: The subjects underwent a detailed interview and comprehensive ocular evaluation as part of the population-based Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Main Outcome: An eye was considered to be blind due to trauma if best-corrected distance visual acuity was worse than 6/60 and the cause was attributed to ocular trauma. Results: A total of 824 (10.6%) subjects gave a history of ocular trauma in either eye, including 76 (1.0%) persons reporting trauma in both eyes. The overall age- and gender-adjusted prevalence of history of eye injury in this rural population was 7.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.0%-8.1%). Men were more likely to have an eye injury than women (odds ratio [OR], 2.1 [95% CI, 1.8-2.5]). After adjusting for gender and other demographic factors, ocular trauma was significantly more frequent among laborers (OR, 1.5 [95% CI, 1.2-1.7]) when compared with other occupational groups. After adjusting for gender, injury with vegetable matter such as a thorn, branch of a tree, plant secretion, etc. (n = 373 [45.3%]) was the major cause of trauma reported in this population. The majority of the eye injuries occurred at the workplace (n = 461 [55.9%]), followed by home (n = 179 [21.7%]). The majority of those affected (n = 806 [97.8%]) did not wear any eye protection at the time of trauma. A significant proportion (n = 307 [43.1%]) of subjects who sought treatment for an eye injury went to an ophthalmologist. Trauma was responsible for unilateral blindness in 39 subjects, an age- and gender-adjusted prevalence of 0.6% (95% CI, 0.4%-0.8%). Conclusions: Most ocular injuries in this rural population occurred at the workplace, suggesting the need to explore workplace strategies to minimize ocular trauma as a priority. Eye care programs targeting high-risk ocular trauma groups may need to consider ocular trauma as a priority in eye health awareness strategies to reduce blindness due to trauma. © 2006 American Academy of Ophthalmology.
dc.identifier.citation Ophthalmology. v.113(7)
dc.identifier.issn 01616420
dc.identifier.uri 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.02.020
dc.identifier.uri https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0161642006002788
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.uohyd.ac.in/handle/1/6713
dc.title Ocular Trauma in a Rural Population of Southern India. The Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study
dc.type Journal. Article
dspace.entity.type
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: