Impact of Psychological intervention on adherence and prognosis in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting
Impact of Psychological intervention on adherence and prognosis in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting
Files
Date
2016-03-01
Authors
Thomas, Marlyn
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Hyderabad
Abstract
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) is an invasive surgical procedure for
patients with Coronary Artery Disease. Given the intensity of pain, dependency and
medical protocols during the period of CABG, patients tend to experience
psychological distress which may lower their adherence and prognosis after surgery.
This research study examined the impact of psychosocial intervention, facilitated in
conjunction with standard hospital treatment, on adherence and prognosis in patients
undergoing CABG. Using a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control groups design,
three groups of patients were compared. The first group received the Programme for
Affective and Cognitive Education (PACE) intervention, the second was given the
Relaxation intervention, and the third formed the Control group with standard hospital
treatment only. The participants were assessed using Hospital Anxiety and Depression
Scale, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, Locus of Control
checklist for CABG, Adherence Scale for Cardiac Patients, and Biopsychosocial
Prognosis Scale for CABG. A sample of 300 participants was sequentially assigned to
the three groups (100 in each) in the order of PACE, Relaxation, and Control. The
interventions were administered twice to the participants. They were also given the
intervention CD or DVD, to be used for reinforcement after discharge. A day before
CABG, the pre-surgery assessment was carried out to measure psychological distress,
perceived social support and health locus of control. Following this on the same day,
the PACE and Relaxation groups received their respective intervention. CABG was
performed the next day as per schedule. A day before discharge from hospital (pre-
discharge phase), the PACE and Relaxation groups received the second part of their
respective intervention. All participants were followed up for six weeks afterdischarge. Psychological distress was assessed during participants’ first and second
medical reviews, while adherence and prognosis were measured at the second medical
review. A sub-sample of 100 participants was followed up five months after discharge
as part of the assessment of prognosis. Semi-structured interviews were individually
conducted with a sub-sample of 15 participants to gain deeper insight into their
feelings, experiences, and opinions. Results showed that the PACE group had the
highest adherence and prognosis as well as the highest reduction in psychological
distress from pre-surgery to second review assessments. The Control group had the
lowest adherence and prognosis as well as the lowest reduction in psychological
distress from pre-surgery to second review assessments. Further, the study attempted
to trace the pathway between interventions, adherence and prognosis. By means of
pathway modelling using multiple linear regression analyses, adherence was found to
be independently and positively predicted by the PACE intervention, the Relaxation
intervention and perceived social support, and negatively predicted by psychological
distress at second review. The PACE intervention was the only positive independent
predictor of prognosis, while psychological distress before surgery, psychological
distress at second review and female gender were negative independent predictors.
Thematic analysis of qualitative data indicated three themes in participants’
experiences: relief through psychosocial intervention, differential impact of
psychosocial interventions, and finding solace in interaction and assessment. The
results consistently indicated that psychosocial intervention, namely PACE, was
effective in optimising adherence and prognosis after CABG, primarily by reducing
psychological distress prior to surgery and during convalescence. The indispensability
of integrating psychosocial care into CABG alongside biomedical treatment is the key
conclusion. Implications, strengths, and limitations of the study are also discussed