An analysis of hydrophobic interactions of thymidylate synthase with methotrexate: Free energy calculations involving mutant and native structures bound to methotrexate

No Thumbnail Available
Date
2010-02-01
Authors
Reddy, Ramirededy Nageswara
Mutyala, Ravichandra Reddy
Aparoy, Polamarasetty
Reddanna, Pallu
Reddy, Mutyala Rami
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Since the human body for many reasons can adapt and become resistant to drugs, it is important to develop and validate computer aided drug design (CADD) methods that could help predict binding affinity changes that can result from these resistant enzymes. The free energy perturbation (FEP) methodology is the most accurate means of estimating relative binding affinities between inhibitors and protein variants. In this paper, we describe the role played by hydrophobic residues lining the active site region, particularly 79 Ile and 176 Phe, in the binding of methotrexate to the Escherichia coli (E. coli) thymidylate synthase (TS) enzyme, using the thermodynamic cycle perturbation (TCP) approach. The computed binding free energy differences on the binding of methotrexate to the native and some mutant E. coli TS structures have been compared with experimental results. Computationally, four different 'mutations' have been simulated on the TS enzyme with methotrexate (MTX): 79 Ile∈→∈ 79 Val; 79 Ile → 79 Ala; 79 Ile → 79 Leu; and 176 Phe∈→∈ 176 Ile. The calculated results indicate that in each of these cases, the native residues ( 79 Ile and 176 Phe) interact more favorably with methotrexate than the mutant residues and these results are corroborated by experimental measurements. Binding preference to wild type residues can be rationalized in terms of their better hydrophobic contacts with the phenyl ring of methotrexate. © 2009 Springer-Verlag.
Description
Keywords
Double topology method, MD simulations, Methotrexate, Mutants, Relative binding free energies, Single topology method, Thymidylate synthase
Citation
Journal of Molecular Modeling. v.16(2)